Libertas · Veritas · ProsperitasL · V · P

Brier score

GlossaryLVP Research

DefinitionThe mean squared difference between probability forecasts and what happened (1 or 0). Lower is better; 0 is perfect and always forecasting 50% scores 0.25.

Formula#

where is the forecast probability and the outcome. Introduced by Brier (1950) for weather forecasts.

Worked example#

Three forecasts: 0.8 (happened), 0.3 (did not), 0.6 (did not). Errors squared: , , . Brier score .

What is a good Brier score?#

It depends entirely on the questions. On coin-flip questions nobody can beat 0.25; on near-certain questions 0.02 may be mediocre. Compare Brier scores only on the same question set, or use a skill score relative to a baseline: . In our simulations a perfectly calibrated forecaster scored 0.146 and a moderately overconfident one 0.150. Separating them reliably took about 1,000 questions (power analysis).

Properties#

  • Strictly proper: honest forecasts maximise the expected score (proof).
  • Bounded: no single forecast can cost more than 1, unlike log loss.
  • Decomposable into reliability, resolution and uncertainty (Murphy 1973): see calibration and the Brier score.

Questions#

What is the Brier score?

The mean squared error between probability forecasts and binary outcomes. Lower is better; a forecaster who always says 50% scores 0.25.

Is a lower Brier score better?

Yes. 0 is a perfect score. Compare scores only across forecasters evaluated on the same questions.

Venues, market designers, researchers and future colleagues: write to us.

Contact the firm →